After entering the
Nativity Church in Bethlehem, walk to the
place to the right of the
altar and take the stone steps down to the underground grotto. There you
will find Jesus
' birthplace, emblazoned by a metal
starburst. But is this really Jesus
' birthplace?
In the late 19th century, British engineers digging around the church's
pillars to study their sturdiness accidentally discovered the mosaic floor
(on display in the church) of a 1st century church that is about six feet
above this starburst. Since 1st century barns weren't in basements, this
cannot be Jesus birthplace.
The precision (or the lack thereof) of Jesus birthplace aside, staring at this
starburst did lead me to think about Jesu
s, whose birth this place is supposed to
mark, and reminded me of the "Lord, Lunatic, Liar" argument that forced me to revisit my atheism a few years ago:
The Bible records Jesu
s making three claims about himself (see John 1:1 and
John 8:58):
"I am God."
"I created the universe."
"I have existed forever."
Before jumping to conclusions, the theoretical possibilities first had to
be considered. Taken as a set, these three claims could only be true or
false.
If the claims are
true, then Jesu
s is who he claimed to be - God or
LORD.
If the claims are
false, but
Jesu
s
sincerely believed them
to be true, then he
is a
LUNATIC.
If the claims are
false, Jesu
s knew them to be false
and was being
insincere, then he is a
LIAR.
C.S. Lewis, the Englishman who reasoned as above indicated that the
unprecedented nature of Jesu
s' claims precludes any other possibility.
In particular, Jesu
s couldn't have been a wise teacher or
prophet because
wise people don't claim to be God.
I tried hard to think of a fourth option to put Jesu
s back
in the corner as just a wise teacher or prophet. Having failed, I then spent months looking for
evidences in favor of Jesu
s having been a lunatic (it seemed the least-worst
option of the three for me) and/or the Bible to be false.